Sweden Ditched Green Energy For Stable Energy System

Multiple brown calf's in a green pasture.

Multiple brown calf's in a green pasture.

Sweden just scrapped their green energy targets, which severely affected the globalist climate agenda. During a public announcement in the Swedish Parliament, Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson expressed concern about the nation’s need for a stable energy system.

Much different than expected. Notable people tote green energy as the only way to the future. In the news about this are Al Gore, Leonardo DiCaprio, John Kerry, and President Biden.

Nonetheless, Sweden is abandoning clean green power and returning to nuclear power.

Finance Minister Svantesson said,

It is not possible for wind and solar power to meet the country’s energy requirements due to their “unstable” nature [1].

 She said that the Swedish government had switched back to nuclear power and dropped its goal of providing “100% renewable energy” to meet the country’s energy needs. She continued to explain,

In substantial industrialized economies, only a nuclear pathway is viable to remain industrialized and competitive. [2]

This was the logical decision as she wants her country to remain competitive worldwide.

California

California, on the other hand, is promising 100% clean energy by 2024.

Other European Countries

European countries are pressured to transition to all-green energy. This is to meet the WEF’s (World Economic Forum) goals. These goals are pushed by the United Nations and World Health Organization (WHO).

For many years, liberals have chased goals that have no foundation. They think the environment needs protection. Time and again, Americans are told that unless we do something, the world will come to an end. But those doing the harping do not lead by example.

 


Notes:

  1. ^ {{Sweden Shocks Europe: Abandons ‘Unstable’ Green Energy Agenda, Returns to Nuclear Power}} (go back  ↩)
  2. ^ {{Sweden Shocks Europe: Abandons ‘Unstable’ Green Energy Agenda, Returns to Nuclear Power}} (go back  ↩)

Leave a Reply

*